Withdraw the Protection of the State from Terrorism Bill (PSTA) – A broad coalition urges the government
A broad coalition of Sri Lankan civil society groups, academics, religious leaders, trade unions, former detainees, and activists has issued a strongly worded appeal to Minister of Justice and National Integration Harshana Nanayakkara, calling for the immediate withdrawal of the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Bill (PSTA).
In an open letter signed by 135 individuals and organisations, the signatories warn that the draft legislation—published on the Ministry’s website—represents an expansion, rather than an abolition, of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), which the government had repeatedly promised to repeal.
“PTA+”: A Return to Repressive Powers
The letter expresses “alarm and disappointment” at the proposed PSTA, arguing that it strengthens executive powers, broadens the definition of terrorism, and threatens fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression and political speech.
The signatories note that on 22 January 2025, Minister Nanayakkara told Parliament that the PTA would be abolished. This commitment, they say, was reiterated during a meeting with civil society organisations on 29 May, where the government also promised a white paper and a consultative process before drafting any new legislation.
“No such white paper has been made available,” the letter states, calling the omission a “deliberate ploy” by the National People’s Power (NPP) government to push the bill through despite public opposition.
Concerns Over Expanded Executive Authority
The letter outlines several key concerns regarding the PSTA:
Expanded police and executive powers, including access to financial information and private communications of individuals who are not suspects.
A widened definition of terrorism, which the signatories argue could criminalise speech, dissent, and political expression.
Emergency-style powers, allowing the executive to proscribe organisations, declare prohibited places, impose curfews, and issue restriction orders.
The signatories warn that such provisions could “seriously threaten the freedom and safety of every citizen.”
The coalition warns that such provisions could “seriously threaten the freedom and safety of every citizen.”
A Call for Repeal, Not Replacement
The coalition argues that Sri Lanka “does not require a specialised terror law” at this point in its history and insists that both the existing PTA and the proposed PSTA must be discarded.
They call on the Minister to:
Withdraw the PSTA bill immediately, honouring the government’s election promise.
Introduce legislation to repeal the PTA, along with a moratorium on its use until repeal is complete.
Publish the promised white paper, explaining the government’s rationale for shifting its policy stance since the 2024 election.
A Renewed Debate on Security and Rights
The appeal comes amid renewed national debate on the balance between state security and civil liberties. Critics argue that the PTA’s legacy—marked by allegations of torture, arbitrary detention, and discrimination—continues to cast a long shadow over Sri Lanka’s justice system and reconciliation efforts.
The signatories emphasise that any new legislation must be preceded by transparent public consultation, especially given the “devastation wrought on the lives of individuals” under the PTA.
